I produce cartoons and create networks.
“When it comes to TV, the only constant is change.” 20 years of television innovation. (via Media Redefined, via Adweek, via Videology)
"WARNING: This is another rant from one of those old school cranky comedy writers. ”Grant Tinker, along with his then-wife Mary Tyler Moore, started MTM Enterprises in 1970. Beginning with THE MARY TYLER MOORE SHOW, Tinker built a dynasty of top notch, high rated, quality shows. How did he do it?” I never met Grant Tinker but I read an interview with him in Emmy Magazine in the early 80s was probably my biggest influence in my producing career. This rant by comedy writer Ken Levine might give you a clue why it was so important to me. (via Media ReDefined)
"WARNING: This is another rant from one of those old school cranky comedy writers.
”Grant Tinker, along with his then-wife Mary Tyler Moore, started MTM Enterprises in 1970. Beginning with THE MARY TYLER MOORE SHOW, Tinker built a dynasty of top notch, high rated, quality shows. How did he do it?”
(via Media ReDefined)
Vince Gilligan: I said as a joke one time on a panel, they said “What does it take to be a good show runner?” and I blurted out, “You need to be a cult leader.”
And as soon as I said it —I was joking, I was trying to get a laugh out of the audience— as soon as I said it, it felt right.
That sounds like a weird thing to say… but instead of the cult being about you, the cult has to be about the show. You have to be the high priest, or priestess. But you have to —what’s the word?— inculcate, is that the right word?
KCRW’s The Business: Like indoctrinate?
Vince Gilligan: Indoctrinate. You have to get everyone enthusiastic. Everyone from your writers, your director of photography, to your cast, absolutely your cast, every department head, every member of the crew, all your producers. You have to get everyone pulling the rope in the same direction.
And in that sense you have to be something of a cult leader, or a cheerleader. Cheerleader’s probably a more palatable term than cult leader.
KCRW: Well, I don’t know, Breaking Bad is pretty dark.
Vince Gilligan: But you gotta everybody sayin’, ‘I’ll bleed for this show!’”
Build-a-Brother Andrew, seated, and Ted Sliwinski in their Detroit workshop. Photo: Brian Finke
"Even as one boom era hurtled toward its end, a diffuse global community of nerds was at work on what it hoped would fuel the next one."
The latest rant during my public talks has been a return to the DIY ethos that the internet has thrust upon us (here’s one of the longer jags from 2006). In a nutshell, it attacks the default position of looking for some big company to give you money for your projects, ceding a huge amount of control in the process.
I’m almost 60 years old, so for most of my career I had no choice; if I wanted to do big, commercial ideas (which I do), the only path was through multiple (many multiple) gatekeepers, most of whom told me my notions were (pick one) stupid, non-commercial, impractical, intellectual, obtuse, obscure, or many other unremembered things.
But times are different, things are completely upside down for big corporations, and there’s no one in the way between you and an audience. Just ask the folks behind “Bottle" (FOF Kirsten Lepore), “Stop Motion with Wolf & Pig, “Weebl’s Stuff,” or “T-Shirt War,” “Happy Tree Friends,” “Dick Figures,” “Annoying Orange,” or “Her Morning Elegance,” among thousands of others. These filmmakers don’t waste their time blaming “them” for getting in the way (like I did for so many years), they look in the mirror and realize that’s who’s going to make a success.
Why bring this all up again? Because there’s proof all over the place —in every business imaginable outside of TV and film— that we’re only at the beginning of a revolution, and that if things go right, the innovative American spirit will bring about a resurrection. One that’s almost impossible to imagine or believe, because most of us, me included, only think about the past and everything we already know. (And, by the way, if the United States continues to fiddle while its industries burn, we’ll see that the rest of world will pass us by.)
"What makes this notion something less than complete fantasy is the availability of new manufacturing machines that are cheap, simple and compact enough for small companies, local associations and even amateur hobbyists to own and operate. What once only big firms with hulking factories could fabricate can now be made in a basement or by e-mailing a design to an online factory-for-hire. These machines can produce all sorts of things, including plastic pencil holders, eyeglass frames and MP3 players."
Today’s New York Times is telling us about some folks —”The Kitchen-Table Industrialists"— who are daring to envision a different future. One that puts heretofore impossible scales of manufacturing in individual hands.
I don’t have to point out the parallels between these physical manufactures and animation, do I?
Hands On Ayah Bdeir, the founder and, more significant, creator of littleBits. Photo: Brian Finke
"Makers, as they call themselves, can’t compete with the long, orderly rows of workers from the poorer provinces of China or India who cut, stitch and solder bras, shoes and cellphones for pennies — or even with the hundreds of billions of dollars a year worth of stuff that continues to pour out of large, old-fashioned American factories. Their method involves creating “hacker space” cooperatives, where a few dozen members share…”
Just a couple of weeks ago, a go-getter entrepreneur came to Frederator with an animation idea that could turn New York on its ear. Los Angeles isn’t going to do anything interesting, currently there’s too much work available, but New York really needs to figure out a new path. And, by the time the work dries up in LA —and it will, eventually— it might be too late. Other small hubs around the country, around the world, might have already replaced the need for such a grand center of creative activity.
Anyhow, check out the article. You might not get nearly as jacked up as I am, but, you’re probably not as stupid, impractical, intellectual, obtuse, or obscure as me.